Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.uniten.edu.my/jspui/handle/123456789/11562
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAbubakar Masud, A.-
dc.contributor.authorMuhammad-Sukki, F.-
dc.contributor.authorAlbarracin, R.-
dc.contributor.authorAlfredo Ardila-Rev, J.-
dc.contributor.authorHawa Abu-Bakar, S.-
dc.contributor.authorFadilah Ab Aziz, N.-
dc.contributor.authorBani, N.A.-
dc.contributor.authorNabil Muhtazaruddin, M.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-08T08:54:38Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-08T08:54:38Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.uniten.edu.my/jspui/handle/123456789/11562-
dc.description.abstractThis paper compares the capabilities of the artificial neural network (ANN) and multiple linear regression (MLR) for recognizing and discriminating partial discharge (PD) defects. Statistical fingerprints obtained from a several PD measurement were applied for training and testing both the ANN and MLR. The result indicates that for both the ANN and MLR trained and tested with the same insulation defect, the ANN has better recognition capability. But, when both ANN and MLR were trained and tested with different PD defects, the MLR is generally more sensitive in discriminating them. In this paper, the results were evaluated for practical PD recognition and it shows that both of them can be used simultaneously for both online and offline PD detection. © 2017 IEEE.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.titleComparison of artificial neural network and multiple regression for partial discharge sources recognition-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/IEEEGCC.2017.8448033-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
Appears in Collections:UNITEN Scholarly Publication
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.