Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.uniten.edu.my/jspui/handle/123456789/11747
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRazak, A.A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAbu-Samah, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRazak, N.N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBaharudin, S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSuhaimi, F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJamaludin, U.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRalib, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMat-Nor, M.B.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-23T04:30:48Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-23T04:30:48Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.description.abstractTight glycaemic control in critically ill patients is used to reduce mortality in intensive care units. However, its usage is debatable in reducing hypoglycaemia or accurately maintain normoglycaemia level. This paper presents the assessment for two 'wider' Stochastic TARgeted (STAR) glycemic controllers, namely Controller A (blood glucose (BG) target 4.4-8.0 mmol/L) and Controller B (BG target 4.4-10.0 mmol/L) with 1 to 3 hour nursing interventions. These controllers were assessed to determine the better control on diabetic and non-diabetic patients. 66 diabetic and 66 non-diabetic critically ill patient's data from Hospital Tunku Ampuan Afzan (HTAA) were employed for virtual trial simulations with a clinically validated physiological model. Performance metrics were assessed within the percentage time in band (TIB) of 4.4 to 8.0 mmol/L, 4.4 to 10.0 mmol/L, and 6.0 to 10.0 mmol/L. Controller A shows better performance in normoglycaemic TIB of 4.4 to 10.0 mmol/L where non-diabetic and diabetic patients achieved 92.5% and 83.8% respectively. In conclusion, Controller A is higher in efficiency and safer to be used for both patients cohorts. However, higher clinical interventions in diabetic patients within this control raise the alarm to reduce nursing workload. This is believed to improve clinical interventions burnout and ensure patient's comfortability. © 2018 Authors.
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleVirtual trial of glycaemic control performance and nursing workload assessment in diabetic critically ill patientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.14419/ijet.v7i4.35.22322-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:UNITEN Scholarly Publication
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.