Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Comparison of artificial neural network and multiple regression for partial discharge sources recognition||Authors:||Abubakar Masud, A.
Alfredo Ardila-Rev, J.
Hawa Abu-Bakar, S.
Fadilah Ab Aziz, N.
Nabil Muhtazaruddin, M.
|Issue Date:||2018||Abstract:||This paper compares the capabilities of the artificial neural network (ANN) and multiple linear regression (MLR) for recognizing and discriminating partial discharge (PD) defects. Statistical fingerprints obtained from a several PD measurement were applied for training and testing both the ANN and MLR. The result indicates that for both the ANN and MLR trained and tested with the same insulation defect, the ANN has better recognition capability. But, when both ANN and MLR were trained and tested with different PD defects, the MLR is generally more sensitive in discriminating them. In this paper, the results were evaluated for practical PD recognition and it shows that both of them can be used simultaneously for both online and offline PD detection. © 2017 IEEE.||DOI:||10.1109/IEEEGCC.2017.8448033|
|Appears in Collections:||COE Scholarly Publication|
Show full item record
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.