Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.uniten.edu.my/jspui/handle/123456789/14784
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVenu Garikapatien_US
dc.contributor.authorStan Youngen_US
dc.contributor.authorYi Houen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-01T06:21:18Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-01T06:21:18Z-
dc.date.issued2019-06-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.uniten.edu.my/jspui/handle/123456789/14784-
dc.description.abstractRecent technological advancements in mobility are creating many options for connecting citizens with employment, goods, and services, particularly in urban areas where modes such as bike and car shares, electric scooters, ridesourcing, and ridesharing are proliferating at a rapid pace. Analysis and tools for overall transportation planning are dominated by urban regional travel demand models whose roots in highway operations poorly reflect the system dynamics in denser areas where parking costs, convenience, and availability—not to mention sustainability concerns and quality of life—are driving people to an ever-greater spectrum of mobility services. In this paper, we present a new paradigm for evaluating mobility options within an urban area. First developed for the U.S. Department of Energy’s Energy Efficient Mobility System research program, this metric is termed the Mobility-Energy Productivity (MEP) metric. At its heart, the MEP metric measures accessibility and appropriately weights it with travel time, cost, and energy of modes that provide access to opportunities in any given location. The proposed metric is versatile in that it can be computed from readily available data sources or derived from outputs of regional travel demand models. End times associated with parking, curb access, cost, and reliability and frequency of service need to be carefully considered to obtain an appropriate and accurate perspective when computing the metric. Ultimately, the MEP metric can be used to reflect the impacts of new mobility technologies (transportation network companies, electric scooters), business models (car shares and bike shares), and landuse practices (such as transit-oriented development) on sustainable urban mobility. This paper lays out the need, requirements, and framework for this new metric, and offers it, in collaboration with the American Society for Civil Engineers (ASCE), as a foundational metric for Smart City assessment.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleMeasuring Fundamental Improvements in Sustainable Urban Mobilityen_US
dc.title.alternativeThe Mobility-Energy Productivity Metricen_US
dc.typeBooken_US
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:UNITEN Energy Collection
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Measuring Fundamental Improvements.pdf1.03 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.